This week
we learned about qualitative research and case study research. I began with
selecting and reading a paper that used a qualitative method. After that I read
the paper Eisenhardt where she described what case study research is and how it
can be done. My learnings from Eisenhardt’s paper was then used to analyze
another paper that used the case study method. Unfortunately I didn’t have the
opportunity to discuss the given literature and my chosen papers with my
friends before writing the blog post that was written before this theme. So I
didn’t have a chance to hear my friends’ ideas and thoughts about this week’s
theme. After going to the seminar I fortunately got the opportunity to listen
to other students thoughts about this weeks theme, which gave me a bigger
understanding.
I didn’t
have much knowledge about case study prior to the theme so what I primarily
learned during this week was what case study research is and how it can be
conducted. After reading the papers
about case study I was a bit confused about what case study is because that
case study can be many things, e.g. it can include both qualitative and
quantitative methods but also just either of them, it can include several cases
or just one. This broad description made it hard to find what the true core of
what case study is. But as usual the
seminar gave me a bigger understanding. Leif Dahlberg described it as an event
or object that has a “natural frame”, for example an organization. He also
compared it with how doctors look at patients or police officers looks at a
crime scene, a comparison I will take with me since it describes case study
research well. What I thought was particularly difficult with case study
research was to differentiate it with other research methods. But at the
seminar I learned that in case study research the case is the subject for the
research, not a hypothesis or theory. The case study should instead generate
new hypothesis or theories that then can be tested with other research methods.
Of course I
learned some about qualitative research but this was an area I was much more
familiar with. What I did learn though was how the coding of the results found
in the qualitative methods can be done, for example by using a software or by
letting different researches interpret the results found.
Hi,
SvaraRaderaIt is nice reflection you have there.
Previously, I also have difficulties to understand the definition of this case study research.
But, during the seminar and small discussion with my group, I learned something that makes me more understand of these case study research.
This is some of the important points in these case studies. The case study uses inductive method to create a theory, so the researcher using a bottom up approach in order to solve the problem. Also, case research method using something that already exists in the real word to begin the research as a case.
Furthermore, from the Eisenhardt article and the seminar I learned that when conduct case study research, we must limit the number of cases between 4 to 10. It is possible to have a smaller number of cases, but it will only create a weak theory which only focus to certain condition. But if we have a lot of cases, it can provide a huge amount of data that can be overwhelming the analysis and may make the research not focus to the initial problem.